Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you've safely linked to the.gov website. Share sensitive details only on official, safe sites.
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney General ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., restricts discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as proprietors and real estate companies as well as other entities, such as towns, banks or other financing institutions and homeowners insurance provider whose inequitable practices make housing unavailable to persons because of:
race or color.
religion.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
special needs.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might file match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of individuals raises an issue of basic public significance. Where force or threat of force is used to reject or hinder reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act also offers treatments for handling specific grievances of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have been victims of an illegal housing practice, might file a problem with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own suit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of individuals based upon recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
Among the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers attempt to disguise their discrimination by offering incorrect information about accessibility of housing, either stating that absolutely nothing was available or guiding homeseekers to specific locations based upon race. Individuals who get such incorrect information or misdirection might have no understanding that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought numerous cases alleging this kind of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to reveal this sort of covert discrimination and hold those responsible liable. The majority of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based on race or color. A few of the Department's cases have actually also alleged that municipalities and other city government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they rejected authorizations or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to mainly minority areas, due to the fact that the potential locals were anticipated to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon religion. This restriction covers instances of obvious discrimination versus members of a particular religion too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances developed to restrict using private homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases submitted considering that 1968 alleging spiritual discrimination is small in contrast to some of the other restricted bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does consist of a restricted exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a spiritual company to reserve such housing to persons of the exact same religion.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Over the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has actually been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, especially those who are bad, and with limited housing options, frequently have little recourse but to endure the humiliation and destruction of unwanted sexual advances or danger having their families and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on property managers who develop an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from occupants or by producing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we seek both to get relief for tenants who have actually been treated unjustly by a property manager because of sex and also deter other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage loaning might likewise negatively impact females, particularly minority ladies. This type of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of an individual's birth or where his/her ancestors come from. Census information suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our nation's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus municipal governments that have attempted to reduce or limit the number of Hispanic families that might reside in their neighborhoods. We have actually taken legal action against lending institutions under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually enforced more rigid underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has actually likewise taken legal action against lenders for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have actually experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This includes new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have done something about it against private property managers who have actually victimized such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, forbids discrimination in housing against families with kids under 18. In addition to forbiding an outright denial of housing to households with children, the Act also prevents housing companies from imposing any unique requirements or conditions on renters with custody of children. For instance, landlords may not locate families with children in any single portion of a complex, place an unreasonable limitation on the total number of persons who may reside in a dwelling, or limit their access to recreational services offered to other renters. In the majority of circumstances, the modified Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing supplier from declining to rent or offer to households with kids. However, some centers may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which meets the standards set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might operate as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has released regulations and extra guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination on the basis of disability in all kinds of housing deals. The Act specifies individuals with an impairment to imply those individuals with psychological or physical problems that significantly limit several significant life activities. The term psychological or physical disability may consist of conditions such as loss of sight, hearing impairment, movement problems, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcohol addiction, drug dependency, chronic tiredness, learning impairment, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity may consist of seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, carrying out manual jobs, looking after one's self, learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also secures individuals who have a record of such an impairment, or are concerned as having such an impairment. Current users of illegal controlled compounds, persons convicted for illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled compound, sex culprits, and juvenile wrongdoers are ruled out disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no securities to individuals with or without specials needs who provide a direct threat to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone postures such a direct danger should be made on a personalized basis, however, and can not be based upon general presumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections for individuals with specials needs has actually focused on two significant locations. One is insuring that zoning and other guidelines concerning land use are not employed to hinder the domestic choices of these people, including needlessly limiting common, or gather together, property arrangements, such as group homes. The 2nd location is guaranteeing that recently constructed multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is available to and usable by individuals with disabilities, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination against people with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with impairments might live together in congregate living arrangements, typically described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act forbids municipalities and other city government entities from making zoning or land use choices or executing land use policies that exclude or otherwise victimize individuals with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To use land use policies or actions that deal with groups of persons with specials needs less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be a regulation restricting housing for persons with disabilities or a specific type of disability, such as psychological illness, from finding in a particular area, while permitting other groups of unassociated people to cohabit in that area.
- To do something about it versus, or deny a permit, for a home since of the impairment of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be denying a structure permit for a home because it was intended to supply housing for individuals with psychological retardation.
- To decline to clear up accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and procedures where such lodgings might be necessary to manage persons or groups of persons with impairments a level playing field to use and take pleasure in housing. What makes up a reasonable accommodation is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for modifications of guidelines or policies are sensible. If a requested modification imposes an excessive monetary or administrative problem on a local federal government, or if an adjustment produces a basic change in a local federal government's land usage and zoning scheme, it is not a "affordable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing against persons with disabilities to include a failure "to develop and construct" certain new multi-family houses so that they are accessible to and functional by individuals with impairments, and especially individuals who use wheelchairs. The Act needs all freshly built multi-family dwellings of 4 or more units planned for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific features: an available entrance on an available route, accessible common and public usage locations, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, available routes into and through each house, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in available location, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and usable bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can steer about the space.
Developers, home builders, owners, and designers accountable for the style or construction of brand-new multi-family housing may be held accountable under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings stop working to meet these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of enforcement actions versus those who stopped working to do so. The majority of the cases have actually been fixed by consent decrees providing a range of types of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible functions into compliance where feasible and where it is not-- alternatives (financial funds or other building requirements) that will offer for making other housing systems available; training on the ease of access requirements for those included in the building and construction process; a mandate that all brand-new housing jobs comply with the ease of access requirements, and monetary relief for those injured by the violations. In addition, the Department has looked for to promote accessibility through building codes.
